![cleanapp app cleanapp app](https://www.jagranimages.com/images/17_11_2017-16ftd06.jpg)
![cleanapp app cleanapp app](https://i1.wp.com/onaircode.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/clean-app-featured-image.png)
It opens the door to the CBR as a potential regulatory interlocutor between formal regulatory authorities and the globally dispersed crypto community. Seriously.įor “bread-and-butter” CryptoLawyers (folks who do volume work for clients wondering if their crypto will be viewed as a “security”) this is very good news. If not, you should befriend a lawyer who does. Can you see it? What does this mean for crypto? If you’re a person who realizes the real-world implications and value of these types of questions, you’ll enjoy this read. “The law” is behind those stately columns, and “the law” is also in front of those stately columns. Stanford’s global reputation and serious external funding practically assure that the work product produced by Stanford’s CBR will be highly influential in current and future socio-legal debates. The announcement is a big deal not only because it acknowledges the centrality of socio-legal implications and challenges, but also because this research center received significant funding from the Ethereum Foundation and several other Blockchain/crypto development groups. The Stanford announcement should make every lawyer and legal theorist happy because it expressly foregrounds the myriad legal aspects of blockchain technology in the new center’s research agenda. We have several answers: (1) if you’re a self-proclaimed or peer-acknowledged CryptoLawyer, a crypto investor, or a crypto enthusiast, this is mandatory reading - period (2) if you’re a crypto developer who is starting to think about “regulatory issues” because your project is scaling or because you’re not getting the answers you want from your current lawyer or legal team - this will be helpful (3) if you’re a casual reader who just stumbled upon this page randomly, there’s quite a bit of palace intrigue, so it might make for a fun read - if you’re into that sort of thing. So, if this is so heavily-accented and potentially accessible only to a small number of globally-minded lawyers attuned to structural questions of governance and justice, why should you read what follows? If you find this insufferably vague (like the redditors on EthLaw) or confusing, this may be our fault - or it may be a function of the vagueness and indeterminacy built into the legal constructs we’re exploring. “C++ is code, many tattoos are code, and Law is Code.” -CleanApp (photo by Alex Hockett)
![cleanapp app cleanapp app](https://softguard.com/sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/16-de-enero-2.jpg)
![cleanapp app cleanapp app](https://lasopapuzzle277.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/6/6/126685400/507227405.jpg)
Consequently, as with any jargon-filled dialect, there will be lots of things that you may miss if you aren’t familiar with American English Legalese, spoken in a particular governance slang. Furthermore, what you’re reading is accented in a particular governance, theory, and international/comparative law slang. This is a long and complex read, written in a dialect of American English called American English Legalese. We made the disclaimer above, and restate for emphasis. We’re a small nonprofit just trying to make the world a better place. Our hope is that both can complement one another.īeyond that, there’s no agenda to this piece - no ICOs, no tricks, no tomfoolery. For our part, we need the crypto community to rally around what we’ve identified as crypto’s killer app in the current stage of blockchain development and adoption. The broader crypto community can benefit from some of the macro- and micro-level legal frameworks and critiques that we’ve developed and have started deploying. We suspect that some of the insights that we develop here might be useful to the crypto developer community, and we offer them as a gesture of good will and good faith. Remembering Medium as the self-proclaimed place where “words matter,” we’ve brought the story here in the sincere hope that the seawater will taste better in this vessel. Reddit doesn’t seem to want to read them in part, because the core point is drowning in a “sea of words,” according to one responder. They offer analysis of several legal postures and legal signals emanating from the cryptosphere that should give cause for alarm, and we are sounding the alarm bells as clearly as we can. Right now, these are messages without a cause. Because the message is so central to the success of the broad crypto enterprise, we decided to offer some more context, and wrote a longer separate response on the EthLaw Subreddit, titled, “Here’s Why Vitalik Needs Better Lawyers, ASAP.” We share the gist of that message down below as well. A bit later, we’ll share a verbatim copy of our comment on this Reddit thread that we joined, and were then booted from.